| 1 |
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 11:16:10 -0800 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 12/20/2014 01:11 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 5 |
> > For tests, override portage.const.EPREFIX in order to avoid unwanted |
| 6 |
> > access to /etc/portage. This override may seem evil, but it is a |
| 7 |
> > convenient way to simulate a prefix install, and it is reasonable |
| 8 |
> > to do this because tests should be self-contained such that the |
| 9 |
> > "real" value of portage.const.EPREFIX is entirely irrelevant. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Any feedback on this? I think it's good to merge. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I know it's ugly, but it's simple and it works. Maybe we'll come up |
| 14 |
> with something fancier later on. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I didn't think it was "ugly", 2 lines of code and some comments... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
yes, merge please |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen> |
Archives