1 |
On 14/08/17 01:19, Zac Medico wrote [excerpted]: |
2 |
> You'll get the same result as --autounmask-use-only if you use |
3 |
> --autounmask-keep-keywords together with --autounmask-keep-masks. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> This way, we can also add --autounmask-keep-license and |
6 |
> --autounmask-keep-use options if we want, and the meaning is very easy |
7 |
> to explain. The meaning of --autounmask-use-only would have required |
8 |
> more explanation, since it allowed license changes in addition to USE |
9 |
> changes. |
10 |
I guess that's the more flexible option, and logical to all users of all |
11 |
locales ;) |
12 |
|
13 |
Does portage ignore missing command-line options, if I set them in my |
14 |
make.conf in anticipation!?!?! |
15 |
|
16 |
Thanks for the clear explanation, extra coding, and look forward to the |
17 |
push to 'live' :) |
18 |
|
19 |
Michael. |