| 1 |
On 03/14/2016 11:36 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:26:23 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 6 |
>> Hash: SHA512 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> I can't say much more than "ACK, probably makes sense" really. But |
| 9 |
>> please test this *a lot* before merging it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I ack as well, the code looks good. I don't know enough about to be |
| 13 |
> able to critique it in detail ;). But it does look decent and the idea |
| 14 |
> of what it is doing sounds good. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>> Regarding the merging of this patch, and th egencache patch that has |
| 18 |
>> already been released: I thought we agreed that .29 should be *only* |
| 19 |
>> the repoman merger, and then bug fixes go into a .30 where we try to |
| 20 |
>> get a stable release with the new repoman. Why was egencache merged |
| 21 |
>> anyway? Should we not merge repoman to stable ASAP before doing |
| 22 |
>> anything else? That would make .29 easier. |
| 23 |
>> - -- |
| 24 |
>> Alexander |
| 25 |
>> bernalex@g.o |
| 26 |
>> https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> With a .29 release coming out very soon after the the .28, the .28 |
| 29 |
> would not get much more testing for the stabilization. If only the |
| 30 |
> repoman code was changed, it makes it easier to know that any bugs |
| 31 |
> submitted for .29 that re not repoman specific, apply to .28 as well. |
| 32 |
> But more that if no non-repoman bugs were filed, then that clears .28 |
| 33 |
> for stabilization. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Can we merge this now? Feedback from the user who reported the issue is |
| 36 |
very positive: |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576786#c7 |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Thanks, |
| 41 |
Zac |
Archives