1 |
Well, what's going on is not that its "legally dead". It got its start and we |
2 |
threw a bunch of comments on the "design". However there does not seem to be |
3 |
much push behind it at the moment. I suspect there may be only one dev |
4 |
working on it (pvdabeel?), if at all. However there is clearly an effort to |
5 |
clean-up and enhance the [oroginal] portage under way. |
6 |
|
7 |
So, if there is enough interest I guess portage-ng may be "restarted", but it |
8 |
will take a lot of *sustained* interest to do so. |
9 |
(And no, I am not the dev working on it nor did I do much work on it :), I |
10 |
just followed the progress for some time). |
11 |
|
12 |
George |
13 |
|
14 |
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 11:44, Hasan Khalil wrote: |
15 |
> There are, absolutely, people working on portage for alternative |
16 |
> platforms. I am one of four developers in training, shooting to work on |
17 |
> gentoo-macos. pvdabeel is the gentoo-macos god currently, so he can fill |
18 |
> you in with all the details. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I'm wondering the same, actually (regarding all the portage limitations |
21 |
> listed on the portage-ng page). What's going on, then? |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |