| 1 |
On 03/07/2010 01:49 AM, Robert Buchholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 06 March 2010, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 3 |
>> In either case, I'm starting to wonder if the change is just trivial |
| 4 |
>> enough to get done in svn2git or git-svn directly. I think other |
| 5 |
>> properties are already there. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The git-svn man page states that a transformation is not trivial. I |
| 8 |
> don't know if in general, svn:ignore is a subset of gitignore. |
| 9 |
> Apprarantly, git-svnimport can handle this transformation, but it will |
| 10 |
> probably come with other problems. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> In my opinion, we should just ignore this small history loss and after |
| 13 |
> the git conversion, commit a .gitignore file with the latest ignore |
| 14 |
> rules to the active branches. But that is just my opinion, and for the |
| 15 |
> actual portage developers to decide. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think that's reasonable. Mainly, the files that need to be ignored |
| 18 |
are *.py[co] and doc/*.html. |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
Zac |
Archives