| 1 |
<div style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:12px;">Dear all,<br> |
| 2 |
<br> |
| 3 |
My bad for not noticing it sooner, but when there is a dependency like ">=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[static-libs?]" (that occurs in virtual/libgudev-215-r3), since 'static-libs' is not a use flags of sys-fs/udev-242, it is silently not considered during dependency solving by emerge.<br> |
| 4 |
However, the PMS states:<br> |
| 5 |
- it is an error for a use dependency to be applied to an ebuild which does not have the flag in question in <span class="ectt-1000">IUSE_REFERENCEABLE</span><br> |
| 6 |
- For EAPIs listed in table <a href="https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-56001r4">5.4</a> as not supporting profile defined <span class="ectt-1000">IUSE </span>injection, <span class="ectt-1000">IUSE_REFERENCEABLE </span>is equal to the calculated <span class="ectt-1000">IUSE </span>value. For EAPIs where profile defined <span class="ectt-1000">IUSE </span>injection is supported, <span class="ectt-1000">IUSE_REFERENCEABLE </span>is equal to <span class="ectt-1000">IUSE_EFFECTIVE<br> |
| 7 |
And 'static-libs' is not in the IUSE_EFFECTIVE of </span>sys-fs/udev-242 (that ebuild has EAPI=6).<br> |
| 8 |
So it seems to me that this current behavior of emerge should be considered an error, no? Or the PMS should be updated?<br> |
| 9 |
<br> |
| 10 |
Best,<br> |
| 11 |
Michael</div> |
Archives