1 |
tvali wrote: |
2 |
> Ok, i send a lot of them, but hopefully they're interesting :) |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I would like to build sql table-structure after getting the |
5 |
> information and send it into this list here so that you could hek out |
6 |
> if it has something missing or poorly optimized. PS. i dont like rules |
7 |
> of database normalizing, so my strutures usually have some "hacks" in |
8 |
> them -- i hope that noone complains about that; normalized structures |
9 |
> are just dull and optimized only for dumb-user-human-readability, |
10 |
> which is imho not the biggest virtue of software code. |
11 |
|
12 |
Uhhh you don't like normalizing your schemas? Normalizing does two |
13 |
things, reduces redundant data, and increases database speed as tables |
14 |
are designed in a manner that minimalizes merging time. |
15 |
|
16 |
Running with a schema you pulled out of your ass is likely to give poor |
17 |
database performance. |
18 |
|
19 |
-Alec Warner |