| 1 |
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 00:21, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Okay, new suggestion. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods |
| 6 |
> > necessary to fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is. |
| 7 |
> > That would be 2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get that out soon and get |
| 8 |
> > trunk out masked at around the same time. As soon as 2.0.54 goes stable |
| 9 |
> > put trunk into ~arch. However, instead of ~arch meaning "regression fixes |
| 10 |
> > only" we could just limit it to "minor changes only" (ie. no big |
| 11 |
> > refactorings, rewrites or similar high risk changes) until it is time to |
| 12 |
> > stable it. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Postponing the cache rewrite is going to piss a lot of poeple off, just |
| 15 |
> FYI :) I realize it's a large patch, but it has been tested by plenty |
| 16 |
> of people, and many of them are waiting for this fix to hit stable |
| 17 |
> (don't want to patch portage on a production system). Any particular |
| 18 |
> reason you want it held off (besides it's immensity?) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The delay it would cause for other things waiting in the pipeline. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives