Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Alexander Berntsen <alexander@××××××.net>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Signing off patches
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:01:59
Message-Id: 52D81091.8000702@plaimi.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Signing off patches by Alec Warner
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 16/01/14 17:41, Alec Warner wrote:
5 >> I'm confused, are you proposing all patches have all of these
6 >> fields? Or we should simply cherry-pick the fields we think are
7 >> useful?
8 Nearly all patches should have Signed-off-by. The others are situational.
9
10 We should strive to always have an Acked-by from the team lead.
11 Reviewed-by should be present on all non-trivial patches.
12 - --
13 Alexander
14 alexander@××××××.net
15 http://plaimi.net/~alexander
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
18 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
19
20 iF4EAREIAAYFAlLYEJEACgkQRtClrXBQc7XuQgD/dGEgjCpW+CgqOYvgkwK2OaU6
21 +auzTl4uAwhhZnM/7ukA/0+E5g9jZd/MtDMLL5qyFnTwMJqRZmPVyGj6N/GVoz7U
22 =lVht
23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----