| 1 |
W dniu śro, 25.10.2017 o godzinie 23∶16 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico |
| 2 |
napisał: |
| 3 |
> In order to prevent false-positives during postinst_qa_check, |
| 4 |
> use a preinst_qa_check function to initialize a baseline state |
| 5 |
> for the postinst checks. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/635474 |
| 8 |
> --- |
| 9 |
> bin/misc-functions.sh | 18 +++++++++++------- |
| 10 |
> bin/postinst-qa-check.d/50gnome2-utils | 3 +++ |
| 11 |
> bin/postinst-qa-check.d/50xdg-utils | 6 ++++++ |
| 12 |
> bin/preinst-qa-check.d/50gnome2-utils | 1 + |
| 13 |
> bin/preinst-qa-check.d/50xdg-utils | 1 + |
| 14 |
> pym/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py | 1 + |
| 15 |
> 6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) |
| 16 |
> create mode 120000 bin/preinst-qa-check.d/50gnome2-utils |
| 17 |
> create mode 120000 bin/preinst-qa-check.d/50xdg-utils |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
To be honest, I think that's a serious overkill for a minor issue. |
| 21 |
The same effect could be achieved by adding a small pkg_postinst() |
| 22 |
to sys-apps/portage. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Best regards, |
| 26 |
Michał Górny |
Archives