| 1 |
On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 00:47 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> > > > > > On Sun, 29 Aug 2021, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > On Sun, 2021-08-29 at 22:06 +0200, Ulrich Müller wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > - eqawarn "For compatibility with |
| 6 |
> > > <=portage-2.1.6.7, only call EXPORT_FUNCTIONS" |
| 7 |
> > > - eqawarn "after inherit(s)." |
| 8 |
> > > + eqawarn "For compatibility with PMS, only |
| 9 |
> > > call EXPORT_FUNCTIONS after inherit(s)." |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > Could you add a sentence that the current Portage behavior is going |
| 12 |
> > to |
| 13 |
> > change in the future? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Sure, but do we actually know that? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That's the plan today, can't be 100% sure it'll happen. You can say |
| 18 |
'can change' if you think it's better -- but people need some motivation |
| 19 |
or they're just going to ignore it as 'another PMS noise'. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Alternatively, we could mention that pkgcore is broken by this. |
| 22 |
My point is mostly to say 'yes, this breaks stuff for users today, it's |
| 23 |
not just some theory'. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Best regards, |
| 27 |
Michał Górny |
Archives