| 1 |
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 00:33, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 28 September 2005 00:22, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Don't mind if the message is changed at all - this one kind of reminds me |
| 4 |
> > of a pre-recorded telephone operator - so if anyone has any |
| 5 |
> > suggestions... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> After a small amount of discussion: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> !!! '%s' is not a valid package atom. |
| 10 |
> !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details. |
| 11 |
> !!! (Did you specify a version but forget to prefix with '='?) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Using portage.isvalidatom() is a little too strict. Any atom with no category |
| 14 |
is marked as invalid. _rc1 has a quick workaround but this patch restores the |
| 15 |
full range of atoms classes that was available previously. |
Archives