From: | foser <foser@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng i18n? | ||
Date: | Wed, 07 Jan 2004 15:01:32 | ||
Message-Id: | 1073487665.16315.1.camel@rivendell | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng i18n? by Jason Mobarak |
1 | On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 09:13, Jason Mobarak wrote: |
2 | > The current portage spec lists a component based design as goal for portage, |
3 | > constructing an i18n emerge-like tool would present less difficulty if |
4 | > portage-ng has a good component design. |
5 | |
6 | For a front-end it would be easier, but to have all messages in the |
7 | components themselves i18n requires an effort from the very beginning. |
8 | |
9 | - foser |
10 | |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng i18n? | Jason Stubbs <jasonstubbs@×××××.com> |