Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 18:08:38
Message-Id: CAJ0EP43WfyPMsmGpOG5vAZTbcR5i7PrEvgfXsdjSaxJ8Lg=ojQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 by "Michał Górny"
1 On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:14 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 23:49 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
4 > > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
5 > > > This now disagrees with the PMS algorithm, doesn't it?
6 > >
7 > > The difference is that there is now a QA warning for something that is
8 > > perfectly within the spec. Maybe the extra verboseness would be enough,
9 > > but the eqawarn line should be omitted? It doesn't provide any info that
10 > > isn't already present in the output of patch itself.
11 > >
12 >
13 > It helps people understand why some patches throw a wall of text while
14 > others don't.
15
16 It also triggers pointless bug reports. Please remove this.

Replies