1 |
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:14 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 23:49 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
4 |
> > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
5 |
> > > This now disagrees with the PMS algorithm, doesn't it? |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > The difference is that there is now a QA warning for something that is |
8 |
> > perfectly within the spec. Maybe the extra verboseness would be enough, |
9 |
> > but the eqawarn line should be omitted? It doesn't provide any info that |
10 |
> > isn't already present in the output of patch itself. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> |
13 |
> It helps people understand why some patches throw a wall of text while |
14 |
> others don't. |
15 |
|
16 |
It also triggers pointless bug reports. Please remove this. |