1 |
On Saturday 22 October 2005 10:08, Brian Harring wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:14:40AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > On Friday 21 October 2005 19:06, Marius Mauch wrote: |
4 |
> > > Jason Stubbs wrote: |
5 |
> > > > After thinking about it, incremental "feature creep" does seem like |
6 |
> > > > the best way to go at this late stage in 2.0's life. The problem is |
7 |
> > > > how to guage what is and what is not more trouble than worth. Perhaps |
8 |
> > > > adhering to the kernel's rule of "Separate each logical change into |
9 |
> > > > its own patch" would help to ease the possible impact of larger |
10 |
> > > > changes? |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > Probably the best solution. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Brian, you agree on this? It'll mean splitting up the cache patch... |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Would be curious how it would be chunked up... |
17 |
> patch of the new subsystem, patch of portage.py modifications? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Depends on def. of logical changes I guess; in the case of the cache |
20 |
> patch, it's kind of all or none with the changes. |
21 |
> Suggestions/preferences? |
22 |
|
23 |
Something like: |
24 |
* Add base class(es) for new cache framework |
25 |
* Add cache backend for XYZ database |
26 |
* Switch portdbapi to the new framework |
27 |
* Remove old framework |
28 |
|
29 |
> > I'm not much for the ChangeLog at all really. At least not without going |
30 |
> > over what makes a good commit message and setting up some guidelines. I'm |
31 |
> > definitely for any ChangeLog being autogenerated though. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> No ChangeLog will piss off users; dev's already poke about it on each |
34 |
> release. |
35 |
|
36 |
Nothing at all will(/has) piss(ed) of users. I can't see people not being |
37 |
happy with a concise set of major changes though. I don't mind much either |
38 |
way. |
39 |
|
40 |
> So... guideliness. ? |
41 |
|
42 |
Should start a new thread about it later. I'd like to get this one finalized |
43 |
first. :) |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Jason Stubbs |
47 |
-- |
48 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |