Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 21:15:18
Message-Id: w6g5zilw8is.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 by Mike Gilbert
1 >>>>> On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Mike Gilbert wrote:
2
3 > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:14 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
4 >> On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 23:49 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
5
6 >> > The difference is that there is now a QA warning for something that
7 >> > is perfectly within the spec. Maybe the extra verboseness would be
8 >> > enough, but the eqawarn line should be omitted? It doesn't provide
9 >> > any info that isn't already present in the output of patch itself.
10 >>
11 >> It helps people understand why some patches throw a wall of text
12 >> while others don't.
13
14 > It also triggers pointless bug reports. Please remove this.
15
16 I don't like that eqawarn either (see above).
17
18 OTOH, users shouldn't normally have "qa" in PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES,
19 so they won't see the warning?
20
21 Ulrich

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies