1 |
> --resume restarts an aborted or failed merge, but it starts it at the |
2 |
> _beginning_ of the last package being worked on. All compilation of |
3 |
> that package must be repeated. |
4 |
|
5 |
Is there a good reason a compile should resume in the middle? |
6 |
For what legitmate and safe reasons can you support this? |
7 |
|
8 |
I have explicitly rejected this many times because there are |
9 |
no realistic reasons to support potentially broken builds. If |
10 |
the compile fails, it probably isn't a singularity within that |
11 |
one file upon which it failed. |
12 |
|
13 |
Developers, of whom there is the knowledge of 'ebuild', can work |
14 |
around the restarting from the beginning issue. |
15 |
|
16 |
--NJ |