Archives
Archives
| From: | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Atom matching behavior | ||
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:51:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20060731225040.GB16589@seldon | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Atom matching behavior by Simon Stelling |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:53:42PM +0200, Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 2 | > Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 3 | > > Opinions? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > I'd never expect it to match 1.20, so this is a bug to me. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Not a bug; it has been that way for a long tim (at least through .50 |
| 8 | last time I checked), iow it's standard now (since cruft in the |
| 9 | tree/folks overlays may rely on it, even if it may be retarded). |
| 10 | |
| 11 | As said in the other email, if after changing it, sure, but do it |
| 12 | proper- don't just stick it in ;) |
| 13 | ~harring |