1 |
On 10/01/2011 12:40 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> Respun now with the help of ferringb. Cleans up the implementation and catches |
3 |
> a few bug and improvements: |
4 |
> - mhash priority moved lower than pycrypto/hashlib because mhash holds GIL |
5 |
> while the other implementations don't. |
6 |
> - hashlib does offer whirlpool if it was built against openssl 1.0. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> 1/5: Refactor RMD160 hashlib code for less-hardcoding |
9 |
> 2/5: Manifest2 hash: Whirlpool |
10 |
> 3/5: Manifest2 hash: SHA512 |
11 |
> 4/5: Manifest2 hash backend provider: mhash |
12 |
> 5/5: GLEP59: Change live Manifest2 hashes to SHA256, |
13 |
|
14 |
This is released in portage-2.1.10.21 and 2.2.0_alpha61, so please go |
15 |
ahead and test the "manifest-hashes = SHA256 SHA512 WHIRLPOOL" setting |
16 |
in metadata/layout.conf, which we can deploy after |
17 |
>=sys-apps/portage-2.1.10.21 is stable. |
18 |
-- |
19 |
Thanks, |
20 |
Zac |