Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: felix@×××××××.com
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [Request] Allow emerge to continue emerging unaffected packages on failure.
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:08:24
Message-Id: 20080608010818.GA4315@crowfix.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [Request] Allow emerge to continue emerging unaffected packages on failure. by Jason Cipriani
1 On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:13:16AM -0400, Jason Cipriani wrote:
2
3 > What I would like to see is a command line option to emerge that enables the
4 > following simple behavior:
5
6 Pardon me if I am wrong, but I want this too, and to me the simplest
7 analogy is to make. If some targets fail, make keeps on building the
8 ones it can, until it is left with no buildable targets. I too have
9 developed a wrapper using --resume --skipfirst, but that feels like a
10 kluge. What I would like is an emerge option to generate a Makefile
11 for output (-M looks available on a quick man check). Then instead of
12 emerge -ptuvDN, I would use -MtuvDN, and run make at my leisure. I am
13 incredibly naive about the inner workings of portage, but since it has
14 dependencies, it does not seem entirely farfetched to generate a Makefile.
15
16 --
17 ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
18 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com
19 GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
20 I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
21 --
22 gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies