Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 08:41:44
Message-Id: 6277c0bf9de53d8610092163f672e1e4fef5a950.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch. by Mike Gilbert
1 On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 17:15 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
2 > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 4:42 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
3 > > On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 16:37 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
4 > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:36 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
5 > > > > Just like 'many of the proposals lately', developers are going to be
6 > > > > the ones disabling it (because they don't care), and users will be the
7 > > > > ones enabling it (because they do care), just to learn that developers
8 > > > > don't care and go complaining to the mailing lists that users dare
9 > > > > report issues they don't care about.
10 > > >
11 > > > I care if the patch is actually broken, which the warning doesn't
12 > > > really tell me. It's just not a very reliable indicator, and will
13 > > > produce false-positives frequently.
14 > > >
15 > >
16 > > You can also take less context into the patch and use -F0. Then you'll
17 > > have the same effect, no warnings to bother you and no pretending that
18 > > the patch applies when it doesn't.
19 >
20 > That really doesn't help me. My point is that I don't want to touch
21 > the patch unless it is actually necessary to do so.
22 >
23
24 Then make patches with -U0.
25
26 --
27 Best regards,
28 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch. Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>