Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions about CVS locations and GID...
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:38:48
Message-Id: 20051006003835.59140f4b@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions about CVS locations and GID... by Brian Harring
1 On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 18:22:37 -0500 Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:14:30AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 | > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 18:00:12 -0500 Brian Harring
5 | > <ferringb@g.o>
6 | > wrote:
7 | > | Beyond that, there is the shebang issue which can be addresses
8 | > | via a combination of automated scans/fixes, and fixing bugs as
9 | > | it's hit. Hardcoded vars in scripts for the path to a binary are
10 | > | an issue also, although again, scans can be done to at least
11 | > | check for it.
12 | >
13 | > This one's a far bigger issue than might be initially obvious. It
14 | > would involve rewriting a whole load of autotools innards...
15 |
16 | Clarify. My knowledge of autotool innards is that it relies on $PATH
17 | for lookup of the tools it uses.
18
19 It does in some places, it doesn't in others. It especially doesn't for
20 things that aren't normally found via PATH. It's a hell of a mess.
21
22 --
23 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
24 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
25 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions about CVS locations and GID... Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>