Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] dblink.mergeme: implement bug #523684
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:28:18
Message-Id: pan$d55e$531e4466$dea45118$f3cec681@cox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dblink.mergeme: implement bug #523684 by Zac Medico
1 Zac Medico posted on Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:35:06 -0700 as excerpted:
2
3 > If a CONFIG_PROTECTed file was installed but no longer exists in the
4 > file system, then it may have been deleted or renamed by the admin.
5 > Therefore, force the file to be merged with a ._cfg name, so that the
6 > admin will be prompted for this update.
7 >
8 > X-Gentoo-Bug: 523684 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL:
9 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523684
10
11 I've experienced this very problem myself -- no way to config-protect an
12 actual deletion of a file. Back on openrc, I ended up with several
13 initscripts symlinked to a "null" script that was basically a comment
14 reminding myself to delete the update.
15
16 I'm on systemd now, and it has the concept of symlinking a unitfile to
17 /dev/null to force-disable it, which helps, but I've seen the problem
18 with a few other files as well over the years, so would love to have this
19 functionality available.
20
21 Thank you! =:^)
22
23 --
24 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
25 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
26 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman