| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 15/01/16 15:21, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> You make it look like you noticed it before I pinged you about it! |
| 6 |
> :-P |
| 7 |
It was just a note for myself to fix it later or at least see to that |
| 8 |
someone else fixes it. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Looks like the test relies on the phase outputting only whatever's |
| 11 |
> inside. Not sure how to proceed best. Should I push all that |
| 12 |
> output into stderr maybe, as a workaround? Or disable printing |
| 13 |
> sizes conditionally to verboseness level? |
| 14 |
I think 2 sounds OK. But the test is meant to catch a regression on |
| 15 |
fd_pipes; perhaps the test should be changed rather than the code. |
| 16 |
What do you think, Zac? |
| 17 |
- -- |
| 18 |
Alexander |
| 19 |
bernalex@g.o |
| 20 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWmQEhAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BnvkQAMqI9kDWeOSWZi/kuHAJJlvB |
| 25 |
YYOLSG/3VRrtnIqEOvvvEl/v50hFgnV/aO85h4UHJ8ZfFuxKDkPS/CVmLUNNA9xp |
| 26 |
dGYNXahXfcE5u3bhksoggTMdnmL0cthbm95/R48SHHwpcnfAgRv7YVuriuS7nujg |
| 27 |
gFqe3AUyTYkFwgcv1aym7pNm1Eq0poQQcMSAnmLb4f+6H113ZJUhnxCeU+lwomdP |
| 28 |
YVheLx2swBEmQq1GrwBP74qD/7G5C9geNJ1v7K64Nsldxk64pifPDXjHSLK+6xTR |
| 29 |
+afX4AEfN8PdHhjbSQJdlll2DZjEM4zHKQ7ZmtWBtYeJs/Hup/lO5uXyXSPVht3D |
| 30 |
AcOm+DpApy1nk+genYwP8XjpRftqREqrfNilFZU8seRyK1vqmwuOG8fWAqfKwGFG |
| 31 |
x7+Hf6c2rr8yjjyNYY5gZ4hhGoQsb+nwRgn4hKP6RGdEqtTclGI1/H1VuH9Ai7LK |
| 32 |
JPbBTcNMRzNGlif+xqOBlMzGAfNXTu2NqoZxDoXQ/bzg/QnHhCMUD0ciI04mUSdi |
| 33 |
jJRNLuIUanD8GIxLER5BkrNXzvWJ64a1DMrcSu12MJAGp1frTu5vJuPUQ2Kw5nQS |
| 34 |
76OkHtBnXTNO0z+7kdcEnaZ31qV8ZMU7xV6z+06SlbpDuShrl5kQ8psBRXG3CwXN |
| 35 |
AP1MdmNxi4XKBPtZDjFx |
| 36 |
=KngQ |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives