1 |
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:33:00 +0900 |
2 |
Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > It isn't about expectations. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Ok, I misunderstood your previous posts on this topic then. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> > I just think it's bad engineering to use the same version prefix for |
9 |
> > two rather different codebases. ... After all, wasn't engineering |
10 |
> > the reason why we're going to increase the minor? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I don't understand where the conflict comes in between the two. |
13 |
> Internally, the old 2.1 has been known as HEAD, trunk and now |
14 |
> 2.1-experimental. Externally, it's been known as 2.1.0_alpha20050718. |
15 |
> The set of new features available in 2.1.0_alpha20050718 are pretty |
16 |
> much all available in current trunk as far as I know... You'll need |
17 |
> to explain the issue in a little bit more detail. |
18 |
|
19 |
I guess it's a mindset thing. You say that "HEAD" and "trunk" are |
20 |
names, for me they are just locations that tell me _where_ I can find |
21 |
them, not _what_ they are. When savior goes into trunk at some |
22 |
point in the future, where will trunk go? branches/2.1-production? |
23 |
Then we have two 2.1 branches which codebases aren't really related, |
24 |
but for someone who hasn't worked on both it will look like one is |
25 |
based on the other. |
26 |
This is also the reason why I didn't just put the savior code into a |
27 |
branches/3.0 but gave it a symbolic name instead. *If* trunk and the |
28 |
existing 2.1 branch would have similar symbolic names I probably |
29 |
wouldn't have objected in the first place, but they don't (and |
30 |
retroactively adding one for 2.1 just for this seems like a bad idea). |
31 |
I guess one can say it's about identification. Yes, it plays with the |
32 |
usability aspects of version numbers, but in this case I prefer |
33 |
technical aspects over usability aspects. |
34 |
|
35 |
I hope this makes it a bit more understandable. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
39 |
|
40 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
41 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |