Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Depending on "active" version
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:30:42
Message-Id: 45C097FD.9010704@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Depending on "active" version by "Kevin F. Quinn"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
5 > On a general note, introducing dynamic dependencies into the depgraph
6 > worries me, although I'm not sure I can articulate why.
7
8 Can you articulate "metadata cache"? :)
9 - --
10 Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
11 Gentoo/Java
12 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
13 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
14 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
15
16 iD8DBQFFwJf8tbrAj05h3oQRAgmCAJ4gYozwZqYL8f2Qi3mLx+cE9G4shwCeNnhM
17 +n+IOpU9vuEw7g7xkSLHEi0=
18 =d+dS
19 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 --
21 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list