1 |
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:54:20 -0400 |
2 |
Dustin Spicuzza <dustin.spicuzza@×××××.edu> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > The appropriate way would be to open a bug in bugzilla, assign |
5 |
> > it to the portage team and attach the patch there (normally |
6 |
> > each file separately, not packed in a tarball) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Thanks. Will do. |
9 |
|
10 |
May be a duplicate of bug #84884 though, which has, among other |
11 |
things, a patch for emerge (2.0.51.x too) similar in purpose to |
12 |
what you are proposing (although there are some cosmetic |
13 |
differences, like option name or the info being summarized at the |
14 |
end instead of being displayed per package): |
15 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84884 |
16 |
|
17 |
Btw, there was not much feedback on that one... would someone be |
18 |
interested if i port it to CVS HEAD? As far as i remember, it |
19 |
should be pretty easy, although the emerge patch has to be |
20 |
rewritten. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
TGL. |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |