Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Additional information to output: emerge -pv
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:23:33
Message-Id: 20050825202205.3f9c46d4@eusebe
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Additional information to output: emerge -pv by Dustin Spicuzza
1 On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:54:20 -0400
2 Dustin Spicuzza <dustin.spicuzza@×××××.edu> wrote:
3
4 > > The appropriate way would be to open a bug in bugzilla, assign
5 > > it to the portage team and attach the patch there (normally
6 > > each file separately, not packed in a tarball)
7 >
8 > Thanks. Will do.
9
10 May be a duplicate of bug #84884 though, which has, among other
11 things, a patch for emerge (2.0.51.x too) similar in purpose to
12 what you are proposing (although there are some cosmetic
13 differences, like option name or the info being summarized at the
14 end instead of being displayed per package):
15 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84884
16
17 Btw, there was not much feedback on that one... would someone be
18 interested if i port it to CVS HEAD? As far as i remember, it
19 should be pretty easy, although the emerge patch has to be
20 rewritten.
21
22 --
23 TGL.
24 --
25 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list