Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Update gcc warning checks to work with gcc-4.9
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:53:43
Message-Id: 5415C80B.5050908@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Update gcc warning checks to work with gcc-4.9 by "Michał Górny"
1 On 09/12/2014 08:47 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > Use -W indicators whenever possible, or more flexible regular
3 > expressions so that our checks correctly match output with
4 > -fdiagnostics-color in gcc 4.9. Also, enable a few extra warnings that
5 > are triggered by -W flags we already use and clean up some outdated
6 > matches.
7 >
8 > The check is confirmed to work correctly with gcc branches 4.7 up to
9 > 4.9.
10 >
11 > Suggested-by: Ryan Hill <rhill@g.o>
12 > Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=508364
13 > ---
14 >
15 > (both patches are based off install-qa-refactor branch)
16 >
17 > bin/install-qa-check.d/90gcc-warnings | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
18 > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
19
20 LGTM.
21 --
22 Thanks,
23 Zac