Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] custom profiles?
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:27:21
Message-Id: 20150311132717.1c3754a9.dolsen@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] custom profiles? by Joakim Tjernlund
1 On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:16:06 +0000
2 Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@×××××××××.se> wrote:
3
4 > On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 10:56 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
5 > > On 03/11/2015 08:48 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
6 > > > On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 11:58 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
7 > > > > On 03/08/2015 10:01 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
8 > > > > > On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 15:47 +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
9 > > > > > >
10 > > > > > > package.use/package.use.force is a bit different though:
11 > > > > > > cat /etc/portage/package.use/qemu
12 > > > > > > app-emulation/qemu vde -alsa -pulseaudio -bluetooth -opengl
13 > > > > > > qemu_user_targets_x86_64 xattr virtfs static-
14 > > > > > > user
15 > > > > > >
16 > > > > > > #Needed by static-user
17 > > > > > > sys-libs/zlib static-libs
18 > > > > > > dev-libs/glib static-libs
19 > > > > > > sys-apps/attr static-libs
20 > > > > > >
21 > > > > > > Moving this to package.use/package.use.force does not
22 > > > > > > respect -alsa, -pulseaudio, -opengl all flags which has a -
23 > > > > > > on them, emerge wants to turn them on again.
24 > > > > > >
25 > > > > > > Am I missing something?
26 > > > > > > Using portage 2.2.18
27 > > > > >
28 > > > > > Appears one have to use package.use.mask for that.
29 > > > > > cat package.use.mask
30 > > > > > app-emulation/qemu alsa pulseaudio bluetooth opengl
31 > > > > > It would be handy if one could use the same syntax as
32 > > > > > in /etc/portage/package.use/qemu(-alsa -opengl etc.)
33 > > > > >
34 > > > > > Jocke
35 > > > > >
36 > > > >
37 > > > > Yes, the inverted use.mask logic can be confusing if you are
38 > > > > not familiar with it. The negative flags have a
39 > > > > special meaning within the context of of portage's "incremental
40 > > > > stacking" behavior, so they can still be
41 > > > > useful, though not in the same way that you you attempted to
42 > > > > use them.
43 > > >
44 > > >
45 > > > So now I got to binary pkgs and profiles, the profile is
46 > > > typically part of ebuild src tree/overlay and a system using only
47 > > > binary pkgs does not need ebuild sources. How does one manage
48 > > > profiles is this case? Just sync an empty /usr/portage tree(sans
49 > > > profile) or is the a better way?
50 > >
51 > > Recent portage has emerge --sync --sync-submodule=profile, which
52 > > might be useful. I would like to work toward handling this case
53 > > better, so your feedback is welcome.
54 >
55 > That would the same as pointing portage to your own empty tree(sans
56 > profile). I was hoping for something connected to your BINHOST so one
57 > can get all in one go and stored in the same directory tree.
58 >
59 > >
60 > > >
61 > > > Jocke
62 > > >
63 > > > PS.
64 > > > emerge --depclean refuses to clean a system which is lagging
65 > > > behind, would it be possible for --depclean to go ahead anyway
66 > > > somehow? --dynamic-deps=n comes to mind.
67 > >
68 > > You should probably put --dynamic-deps=n in EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS,
69 > > since this option typically causes these kinds of problems with
70 > > --depclean. You don't need --dynamic-deps if you use --
71 > > changed-deps when updating.
72 >
73 > If I do --dynamic-deps=n then man emerge suggest to also do
74 > fixpackages(I guess after every SYNC) which feels a bit heavy, is
75 > this still needed?
76 >
77 > Why is --dynamic-deps=y default? This feels like lying about your
78 > true deps, I am probably missing something here, an example would be
79 > great:)
80
81
82 Because the last time we even discussed the possibility of changing
83 this and steps that might be to fix problems,... There were a few
84 individuals that raised such a stink about it, they even brought it to
85 council to have us STOPPED.
86
87 So, as a result much of the portage team don't feel like working on
88 portage. Heaven forbid we actually make a change!
89
90
91 >
92 > Will --depclean with --dynamic-deps=n always succeed? I realize that
93 > it could be dangerous but sometimes would like to have the option.
94 >
95 >
96 > BTW, this text is hard to parse:
97 > --binpkg-changed-deps [ y | n ]
98 > Tells emerge to ignore binary packages for which the
99 > corresponding ebuild depen‐ dencies have changed since the packages
100 > were built. In order to help avoid issues with resolving
101 > inconsistent dependencies, this option is automatically enabled
102 > unless the --usepkgonly option is enabled. Behavior with
103 > respect to changed build-time dependencies is controlled by the
104 > --with-bdeps option.
105 >
106 > --binpkg-changed-deps=y -> Ignore bin pkgs with changed deps?
107
108
109 --
110 Brian Dolbec <dolsen>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] custom profiles? Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>