Archives
Archives
| From: | Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] has_version and built_with_use ignore package.provided | ||
| Date: | Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:13:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200608071911.46130.carlo@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] has_version and built_with_use ignore package.provided by Edward Catmur |
||
| 1 | Checking for a package that isn't either a direct or indirect dependency is |
| 2 | plain wrong. package.provided is not supported - it's the users fault, if he |
| 3 | insists to sidestep Portage. There is no valid case for your construct. With |
| 4 | regards to QA, it wouldn't be wrong to have a better solution, but given that |
| 5 | built_with_use() is itself only a workaroud for still not having use |
| 6 | dependencies, it's a bit pointless. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Carsten |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] has_version and built_with_use ignore package.provided | Paul Bredbury <brebs@××××.com> |