| 1 |
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 01:06:07PM +0300, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> the branch is finished make a tag. Btw, anyone object to swap |
| 3 |
> branches/2.0 with trunk (seeing that 2.1 is dead)? |
| 4 |
Would be nice, yah. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> >Another "by the way", `svn -v log > ChangeLog` for 2.0.53_rc6. I'm open to |
| 7 |
> >anything better if anybody has a good format for autogeneration. The |
| 8 |
> >quality of the commit messages themselves isn't really useful though |
| 9 |
> >without knowing their context, so this might be a bit of a catch 22.. For |
| 10 |
> >2.0.54, viewsvn should be available so it might be better to just use the |
| 11 |
> >tracker bug to manually create a summary of notable changes. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Hmm, so you want to change the ChangeLog into release notes? IMO we |
| 14 |
> should have both (a detailed technical ChangeLog and user friendly |
| 15 |
> release notes). |
| 16 |
ChangeLog++ |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Should just tag in a script for generating a release. Hand it a |
| 19 |
version, it bails if the branch isn't clean (unknown files), else it |
| 20 |
tags, generates changelog, and tarballs the beast. |
| 21 |
~harring |
Archives