From: | Amit Dor-Shifer <amitds@××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Can an ebuild override CONFIG_PROTECT? | ||
Date: | Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:26:36 | ||
Message-Id: | 4ADADF49.1040008@oversi.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Can an ebuild override CONFIG_PROTECT? by Zac Medico |
1 | Does emerge actually call 'env-update'? If so, where (I can't find in in |
2 | the code)? |
3 | if not, who performs the environment update when an ebuild is emerged |
4 | (I'm supposing env-update gets called. I didn't call it explicitly in my |
5 | ebuild, yet still /etc/profile.env gets updated with CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK)? |
6 | Amit |
7 | |
8 | Zac Medico wrote: |
9 | > Amit Dor-Shifer wrote: |
10 | > |
11 | >> Thanks. |
12 | >> IMHO this usage of env.d should be documented in the ebuild howto, as it |
13 | >> presents a useful-yet-not-trivial mechanism. |
14 | >> |
15 | >> I'd document it, if: |
16 | >> a) I get no objection from others. Anyone? |
17 | >> b) I'd be referred to the proper place to document it in. There's a page |
18 | >> dealing w/ |CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK at |
19 | >> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/config-protect/index.html, |
20 | >> but I doubt if that's the proper place. |
21 | >> |
22 | > |
23 | > It's touched upon in the User Handbook here: |
24 | > |
25 | > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?full=1#book_part2_chap5 |
26 | > |
27 | > It might be nice to mention it somewhere in the Developer Handbook: |
28 | > |
29 | > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?full=1 |
30 | > |
31 | > That's maintained by the devrel team, and you can file a bug for |
32 | > them at bugs.gentoo.org. |
33 | > |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Can an ebuild override CONFIG_PROTECT? | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |