Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] post_sync actions
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:30:00
Message-Id: 20051030062916.GC6443@nightcrawler
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] post_sync actions by Jason Stubbs
1 On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 03:18:45PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
2 > Ok, that works. Adding functionality that won't be supported long term even by
3 > an alternative method kind of worries me. ;)
4
5 Agreed.
6
7 So... pre/post for .53? Post sync is a late comer, and is strictly a
8 feature, so that (imo) can sit till .54.
9
10 if an rc7 is coming, I'd nudge strongly that pre/post should slide in
11 alongside since it's non invasive, and allows the java peeps to do
12 their thing rather then waiting for .54 to hit.
13
14 Yay/nay?
15 ~harring

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] post_sync actions Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>