1 |
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 03:18:45PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
2 |
> Ok, that works. Adding functionality that won't be supported long term even by |
3 |
> an alternative method kind of worries me. ;) |
4 |
|
5 |
Agreed. |
6 |
|
7 |
So... pre/post for .53? Post sync is a late comer, and is strictly a |
8 |
feature, so that (imo) can sit till .54. |
9 |
|
10 |
if an rc7 is coming, I'd nudge strongly that pre/post should slide in |
11 |
alongside since it's non invasive, and allows the java peeps to do |
12 |
their thing rather then waiting for .54 to hit. |
13 |
|
14 |
Yay/nay? |
15 |
~harring |