| 1 |
On 05/27/2012 03:27 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
> I have seen today a fixed bug that was only reproducible for people |
| 3 |
> (like me) running without userpriv (but maintainer didn't found it |
| 4 |
> before commiting because he was running with this feature enabled), I |
| 5 |
> have also seen some packages skipping tests when not using userpriv. I |
| 6 |
> am unsure then, why default is still to not use userpriv? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I think it's not enabled by default just because there's always risk |
| 9 |
involved in changing the defaults. I've been using it for years and I |
| 10 |
don't remember experiencing any problems because of it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> I haven't |
| 13 |
> found important bugs opened pointing regressions but, since it's still |
| 14 |
> disabled by default, I am still running in the old way instead of using |
| 15 |
> "userpriv usersandbox" :/ |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I plan to send an email to the gentoo-dev mailing list, to ask if there |
| 18 |
are any objections to having FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" enabled by |
| 19 |
default. |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Thanks, |
| 22 |
Zac |
Archives