1 |
On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 12:40 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> Most upstreams and build systems do not make this distinction, so this |
3 |
> causes unnecessary hacks in ebuilds. |
4 |
> |
5 |
|
6 |
The hacks aren't 'unnecessary'. There is a very good reason that files |
7 |
that are used *purely at build time* don't land in /. That reason is |
8 |
disk space. Even if people nowadays are forced to use initramfs with |
9 |
separate /usr, it doesn't mean you should just let their rootfs fill up |
10 |
with useless files. |
11 |
|
12 |
Do you have any *real* argument? Because 'unnecessary hack' is |
13 |
basically your feeling of ebuild aesthetics. My aesthetics is more |
14 |
worried about useless clutter in /lib*. FHS agrees with me, as you |
15 |
yourself admitted yesterday. |
16 |
|
17 |
So why do you believe we should introduce this regression? And why are |
18 |
you trying to sneak it past most of the developers via gentoo-portage- |
19 |
dev instead of gentoo-dev? |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Best regards, |
23 |
Michał Górny |