| 1 |
I'm sorry, my client didn't allow to send plain text email anymore... |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
So, here is my original email. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Dear all, |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
My bad for not noticing it sooner, but when there is a dependency like ">=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[static-libs?]" (that occurs in virtual/libgudev-215-r3), |
| 8 |
since 'static-libs' is not a use flags of sys-fs/udev-242, that cpv is silently not considered during dependency solving by emerge. |
| 9 |
However, the PMS states: |
| 10 |
- it is an error for a use dependency to be applied to an ebuild which does not have the flag in question in IUSE_REFERENCEABLE |
| 11 |
- For EAPIs listed in table 5.4 as not supporting profile defined IUSE injection, IUSE_REFERENCEABLE is equal to the calculated IUSE value. For EAPIs where profile defined IUSE injection is supported, IUSE_REFERENCEABLE is equal to IUSE_EFFECTIVE |
| 12 |
And 'static-libs' is not in the IUSE_EFFECTIVE of sys-fs/udev-242 (that ebuild has EAPI=6). |
| 13 |
So it seems to me that this current behavior of emerge should be considered an error, no? Or the PMS should be updated? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
This is related to the tool I'm working on: should my tool allow this behavior, or fail like it is currently doing (I guess the former)? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Best, |
| 18 |
Michael |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
On 6/16/20 7:42 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Please do NOT send html emails. text only please |
| 24 |
> |
Archives