1 |
On Sunday 11 June 2006 18:38, you wrote: |
2 |
> The man page says you're the author (of the man page anyway) of |
3 |
> emaint. I don't quite understand this utility. |
4 |
|
5 |
i just usually write all the man pages |
6 |
|
7 |
> I've noticed that emerge now has something called a "set" of which |
8 |
> "world" is such a thing. This is a relatively recent change |
9 |
> (not in documentation for emerge 2.0.51.22-r3). |
10 |
|
11 |
not really, portage has always had "sets" ... the "world" and "system" sets |
12 |
|
13 |
> But even in the latest `man emerge`, this is still mentioned: |
14 |
> /var/lib/portage/world |
15 |
> Contains a list of all user-specified packages. You can safely |
16 |
> edit this file, adding packages that you want to be considered |
17 |
> in world set updates and removing those that you do not want |
18 |
> to be considered. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> So my question is, if I can edit it like it says I can, why should it |
21 |
> complain when I do something like this?: |
22 |
|
23 |
dunno, i wasnt part of decision making for said change |
24 |
|
25 |
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
26 |
> cdimage portage # echo 'sys-process/vixie-cron' > |
27 |
> /var/lib/portage/world cdimage portage # emerge world -pv |
28 |
> |
29 |
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Calculating world dependencies | |
32 |
> !!! Problems have been detected with your world file |
33 |
> !!! Please run emaint --check world |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> ... done! |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Total size of downloads: 0 kB |
39 |
> cdimage portage # emaint --check world |
40 |
> Checking world for problems |
41 |
> |
42 |
> 'sys-process/vixie-cron' is not installed |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Finished |
46 |
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
47 |
> So now what? Is world sort of useless for editing? |
48 |
> |
49 |
> Has something changed? Why can't I make edits to my world file? What I |
50 |
> have typically done is to copy world files from other systems during |
51 |
> install so that all the good stuff that I like is present (more or |
52 |
> less with minimal tweaking) on each new system I deploy. This worked |
53 |
> great until today. Any hints would be appreciated. I didn't feel that |
54 |
> this was necessarily a bug since it's just likely that I'm not |
55 |
> understanding some subtle thing that has changed. Thanks. |
56 |
|
57 |
i'll let the guys who made said change comment on it |
58 |
-mike |