Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:54:21
Message-Id: CAAr7Pr9cj9A6MV8XSws4DOo2jC2_QQLVwZOXz9Sj1-UA3VXamw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring by Alexander Berntsen
1 On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Alexander Berntsen <alexander@××××××.net>wrote:
2
3 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
4 > Hash: SHA256
5 >
6 > On 19/01/14 23:46, Alec Warner wrote:
7 > > Does pylint or pyflakes point out if you mess it up?
8 > Not very successfully in my experience.
9 >
10
11 I'm very against add a bunch of extra rules that have to be enforced by
12 hand. I want to make it easy to contribute, not more difficult. If bob can
13 run a tool that tells him all the things that are wrong with his patch,
14 that avoids us having like 1/3rd of the conversations on list ;)
15
16 -A
17
18
19 > - --
20 > Alexander
21 > alexander@××××××.net
22 > http://plaimi.net/~alexander
23 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
25 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
26 >
27 > iF4EAREIAAYFAlLcVrsACgkQRtClrXBQc7XZcQD9GD8lV8HpZbQjpqu8ggNh4vOo
28 > /fvFsCI2PaWiEsC4ISUA/iYRiXAYD7SEF4a3R/t6vOdmEQSHyvZcxH9NDwI4/biQ
29 > =RMJ0
30 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 >
32 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring Alexander Berntsen <alexander@××××××.net>