Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] post_sync actions
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:09:27
Message-Id: 200510301609.28937.jstubbs@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] post_sync actions by Brian Harring
1 On Sunday 30 October 2005 15:29, Brian Harring wrote:
2 > So... pre/post for .53? Post sync is a late comer, and is strictly a
3 > feature, so that (imo) can sit till .54.
4 >
5 > if an rc7 is coming, I'd nudge strongly that pre/post should slide in
6 > alongside since it's non invasive, and allows the java peeps to do
7 > their thing rather then waiting for .54 to hit.
8 >
9 > Yay/nay?
10
11 I'd say nay. I can't imagine any other bugs turning up for .53 after _rc7
12 (although I couldn't imagine any for _rc6 either) so we should probably
13 reopen branches/2.0 for .54 after .53_rc7 is released and do a .54_pre1
14 next weekend (or earlier). Would that suffice?
15
16 --
17 Jason Stubbs
18 --
19 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list