1 |
On Sunday 30 October 2005 15:29, Brian Harring wrote: |
2 |
> So... pre/post for .53? Post sync is a late comer, and is strictly a |
3 |
> feature, so that (imo) can sit till .54. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> if an rc7 is coming, I'd nudge strongly that pre/post should slide in |
6 |
> alongside since it's non invasive, and allows the java peeps to do |
7 |
> their thing rather then waiting for .54 to hit. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Yay/nay? |
10 |
|
11 |
I'd say nay. I can't imagine any other bugs turning up for .53 after _rc7 |
12 |
(although I couldn't imagine any for _rc6 either) so we should probably |
13 |
reopen branches/2.0 for .54 after .53_rc7 is released and do a .54_pre1 |
14 |
next weekend (or earlier). Would that suffice? |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Jason Stubbs |
18 |
-- |
19 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |