| 1 |
Paul -- |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
That would be great! As 'gentoo rocks', it is suitable for production |
| 4 |
servers. It is my personal server. I only apply security fixes on an |
| 5 |
ongoing basis. Then quarterly I update my world. Regression testing is |
| 6 |
a bitch, so I do not want to firefight those issues more than a few |
| 7 |
times each year. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-rdg |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 02:42, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 12 |
> On Friday 05 December 2003 04:29, rd wrote: |
| 13 |
> > Referring to the following below, is portage-ng going to address this |
| 14 |
> > very serious issue as related to applying JUST security updates to |
| 15 |
> > "stable" production gentoo boxes? |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> This is an issue that will hopefully be addressed in the future, but it has |
| 19 |
> little to do with portage. We will look at providing releases that we will |
| 20 |
> only provide security fixes on. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Paul |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes! |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives