| 1 |
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 04:17, Michael Kohl wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:08:16 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Philippe Lafoucrière <lafou@×××××××.fr> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > I'd like to work on the cache part, since I'm getting sic of "emerge |
| 6 |
> > rsync". |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> 2.0.51 is changing the cache format. I don't know yet if this makes |
| 9 |
> "emerge sync" faster, but if you're eager to try it out you can unmask |
| 10 |
> it in your /etc/portage/package.unmask. |
| 11 |
The change is due to the addition of provide's to the cache; that |
| 12 |
doesn't affect speed, although .51 is a bit faster since a couple of |
| 13 |
issues w/ the cache handling code have been corrected. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Main one being the addition of __cache(Array|Key) to portage_db_template |
| 16 |
storing the last 3 keys pulled for that category, correcting an issue w/ |
| 17 |
aux_get where it went to disk *way* more then was needed. At some point |
| 18 |
I'd think the __cache(Array|Key) addition should be moved up above the |
| 19 |
portage_db layer, since w/ right now it makes addition of a memcached |
| 20 |
based cache semi-tricky/ugly. |
| 21 |
~brian |
Archives