Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 12:10:57PM +0100, Simon Stelling wrote:
> tvali wrote:

> >* When updating or installing new package, if something goes wrong,
> >still emerge other packages, which havent failed packages as
> >dependencies -- in my case, for example, when i do --update, for
> >example, then the fact that update of first package fails does not
> >definitely mean that i dont want to update others

> --resume

No, make -k.  At least that's what I would dearly like to see.

-- 
            ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
     Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com
  GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E  6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list