| 1 |
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 08:52:13PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday 13 November 2005 04:00, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > *cough* that's that funky _p1 you're using there? :) |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > patchlevel... I think it gives a stronger impression that 2.0.53 is distinct |
| 7 |
> > from 2.0.54. Is distinct the right word? I mean that it kind of shows that |
| 8 |
> > 2.0.53 is done but there was something that needed to be fixed quickly. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> 2.0.53.1 vs 2.0.53_p1 vs 2.0.53.p1 ... either of the three indicates |
| 11 |
> 2.0.53 had minor fix tagged onto the base 2.0.53 release... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
i prefer 2.0.53.1 myself |
| 14 |
-mike |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives