Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Francesco Riosa <BastianBalthazarBux@×××××××××.it>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Order of operations: buildpkg
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:44:13
Message-Id: 43D5E8B2.2070509@pnpitalia.it
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Order of operations: buildpkg by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Monday 23 January 2006 15:55, Simon Stelling wrote:
3 >
4 >> Lares Moreau wrote:
5 >>
6 >>> Many ebuilds fail due to failed QA. How difficult would it be to have
7 >>> the package create the tarball before the QA tests. If this were
8 >>> possible, QA could be slightly quicker, as there would be no need to
9 >>> rebuild the entire package, with features disabled, upon failure.
10 >>>
11 >> I think you rather want to use FEATURES=keepwork than doing such ugly
12 >> stuff.
13 >>
14 >
15 > keepwork wouldnt accomplish anything wrt to what he wants
16 >
17 > this would prob do it though:
18 > ebuild <ebuild> install package qmerge
19 >
20 >
21 Indeed, could someone shade a light on what happen to /var/db/pkg and
22 world file when using "ebuild" this manner ?
23 Could be rephrased as "Does it act exactly the same way emerge does ?"
24
25
26
27 --
28 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Order of operations: buildpkg Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>