1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 11/10/15 18:45, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> Nope, don't have any. Though AFAICS there's all-over-the-place |
6 |
> consensus that it's deprecated, and most of the developers complain |
7 |
> when they see it. |
8 |
If you can show me the consensus, I'll ACK it. Alternatively anyone |
9 |
else on the team that have observed this consensus may ACK it. |
10 |
|
11 |
I'm sorry, but I've been so busy that I'm a bit out of the loop with |
12 |
Gentoo. I'm not doing this to be annoying, but it is effectively |
13 |
(probably) all my fault. |
14 |
|
15 |
> If I based it on HEAD, it wouldn't apply with the other patch on |
16 |
> ;-P. |
17 |
Yeah, but if we for some reason we decided to not apply that one, but |
18 |
do apply this one, it would be a bit of a hassle. And they are not |
19 |
related enough to be in a patch series, so... But this is nitpicking |
20 |
and a non-issue since I ACKed the first patch. :] |
21 |
|
22 |
- -- |
23 |
Alexander |
24 |
bernalex@g.o |
25 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
27 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
28 |
|
29 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWGpOXAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BhK8P/ihHagl/CgC65yPXCW0LsHGE |
30 |
duSIw7Oi8h2nmeHjnrSSWpn9NnAfq9+uamPncMPSGQRKi15/0SvmhMsNFr/yinxL |
31 |
Bhsqp2a4V3W+vhQ5uZAeaBwK1UWng9hDIXwEBOfQvBa+4ULFHFKuMQA1dfqUp8Jt |
32 |
mYstCQHUjP23xKmgfVXmN1Ak1K6pOp0nQ260URiSHkpx3U26wJhN/0sx793eiJcS |
33 |
I1NvMm6aoHqiqa0afEDnemE+Z1tgKLJQmlJJdrtQuBIOdVNxdS1O74/N5v0xdn+E |
34 |
Eizb3NiRk9Q3kZEnvV+fvFF0P7+QJxVuMN0OV/Oju3e3sto0y8RLzlJ1Kfi6MlKw |
35 |
KUH6KBNG/NWUD3nvINMAxVHCE5cSCHLlIaBqoSH7LEBhu2Hu7pnzGRh9qdyno+UG |
36 |
i3viyhRRYG1AVtziq5kT27Y0oSpoRdVZCLsoPTJ13cU3RORexQy1KKSVReok9oWc |
37 |
1IXzYIRrzTT6McpcRiLW4oySqIkP4XFnmVTFvOsB2RiK2XyRy5Ef8D/lVnf/LM0e |
38 |
1hqm5AseK2aaZyWp4CnTJ0QSI5IvsGdHSmnz4uNxfE474QpDFqo9qrMoQY3qy/v9 |
39 |
yJjHJGskpl75Kb77ZcHEzmcgP/BFZkXAxynRXs6aI69MaHKXLvqlcS0OdAvCqTxd |
40 |
ZmLsKsjSlayjCoekr3qP |
41 |
=W+yH |
42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |