1 |
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:50 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote: |
4 |
> > > There is also a bug with atom parsing iirc on 32bit platforms. gradm was |
5 |
> > > the test case. Think we need to change from int to long. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > the code is documented as having 64bit limitations for any specific component. |
8 |
> > the last release doesnt have the updated work i did in qatom to handle the |
9 |
> > latest atom spec though, and that includes moving from 32bit to 64bit for |
10 |
> > components ... |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Sounds good. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > > Maybe another with -rX parsing. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > if you're thinking of the open bug, that's an eprefix specific extension. |
18 |
> > they turned the X in -rX into a floating point #. which isnt supported |
19 |
> > currently. |
20 |
> > -mike |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I don't think that was it. But I can't recall well enough off the top of |
23 |
> my head the problem that somebody pointed out to me one day on irc while |
24 |
> I was probably too busy. |
25 |
|
26 |
Mike, |
27 |
The error was pointed out to me again today on irc by jmbsvicetto and |
28 |
hoffie, which reminded me of what I had forgot before in this thread. |
29 |
|
30 |
The problem was/is that qpkg is not handling -rX extensions properly. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
35 |
Gentoo Linux |