| 1 |
On 10/21/2011 01:35 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 21-10-2011 00:30:05 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 10/21/2011 12:09 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 21-10-2011 06:09:57 +0000, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> UpdateChangeLog: split out/test copyright regex |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> This also fixes a case where something like "Copyright 2011 " would be |
| 8 |
>>>> replaced with "Copyright 2011-2011 ". |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> I like this, but it should only happen when one would live in 1999 |
| 11 |
>>> (that's why I added it unconditionally), see below. I'm affraid we need |
| 12 |
>>> the 1999 to be configured, for legal reasons (though I don't claim to be |
| 13 |
>>> an expert on this case, just judging from the comments from echangelog). |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> I don't see anything like that in echangelog. What would be the point of |
| 16 |
>> re-writing copyright start dates, when those should already be correctly |
| 17 |
>> inherited from skel.ChangeLog anyway? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Sure, but this is mainly intended for ebuilds and files (like init |
| 20 |
> scripts?), I guess. I considered using skel.ebuild for .ebuild files, |
| 21 |
> perhaps that's just the best to avoid hardcoding any years. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Well, repoman only creates ChangeLog files, not ebuilds or other files. |
| 24 |
So, how is skel.ebuild relevant? Shouldn't repoman assume that the |
| 25 |
existing copyright start date is correct in ebuilds and other files? |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Thanks, |
| 28 |
Zac |
Archives