Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Douglas Anderson <douglasjanderson@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] REVDEP-REBUILD and emerge default options
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:49:51
Message-Id: 4511e6e80910211649g6ca2cba2xdc68b6858df159d4@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] REVDEP-REBUILD and emerge default options by Zac Medico
1 There's probably not much reason why a filtered set of OPTS can't be
2 accepted. I haven't looked this over yet but this code should probably
3 handle the filtering:
4
5 http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/python/changeset/171
6
7 from: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282474#c4
8
9 -Doug
10
11 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
12
13 > Arthur D. wrote:
14 > > To Zac:
15 > >> I'd suggest passing the -p option to revdep-rebuild on the command
16 > >> line. That's how I always do it. Then you can run it again and it's
17 > >> supposed to cache the result (if you don't use the -i option).
18 > > I know how to pass options on command line. I was asking about changing
19 > > default behaviour to respect emerge default options out-of-box. Passing
20 > > same options every time is not a good way of doing things, no?
21 >
22 > Yeah, I think your right. I suppose that revdep-rebuild could simply
23 > assume that the default options are good and allow the user to
24 > specify --ignore-default-opts if necessary. The only options that I
25 > think would conflict are --update, --selective, and --noreplace.
26 > --
27 > Thanks,
28 > Zac
29 >
30 >