Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: euse creates broken /etc/make.conf when USE declaration starts with empty line:
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:50:06
Message-Id: pan.2009.06.24.19.49.36@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] euse creates broken /etc/make.conf when USE declaration starts with empty line: by Joseph Booker
1 Joseph Booker <joe@××××××××××.net> posted 20090624102731.677409f3@fenrir,
2 excerpted below, on Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:27:31 -0500:
3
4 > btw, gentoo-portage-dev really isn't the place to discuss euse bugs,
5 > gentoo-dev, gentoo-user, the forums, or bugs.gentoo.org would be more
6 > appropriate. (gentoo-portage-dev is more about the internals of portage)
7
8 FWIW, gentoo-dev wouldn't be either. But as here, pretty much all lists
9 (and forums and IRC and...) should be at least polite enough to refer
10 first time posters to the correct locations, and often to answer the
11 question too. =:^)
12
13 But Gentoo uses bugs for all sorts of stuff, including administrative
14 stuff like tracking new and retiring devs, and other "not ordinarily
15 something you'd call a bug" bugs, so that's a reasonable place (even if
16 they do get marked invalid or notabug at times), and the various user
17 forums/lists/IRC-channels work well if you want a second user opinion, or
18 just some peer help, before bothering a dev.
19
20 --
21 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
22 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
23 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman