| 1 |
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 20:31:27 +0200 |
| 2 |
Jauhien Piatlicki <jauhien@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> 08.09.14 19:04, Zac Medico написав(ла): |
| 5 |
> > On 09/08/2014 04:32 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> Hi, |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> can repoman logic be changed a little bit, so it prepends commit |
| 9 |
> >> message for git repos with package name? Otherwise git log when |
| 10 |
> >> using repoman looks not informative. |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> Regards, |
| 13 |
> >> Jauhien |
| 14 |
> >> |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > We could add an option for that, rather than make it mandatory, so |
| 17 |
> > that the existing behavior remains for flexibility. You could |
| 18 |
> > enable the new option by default via REPOMAN_DEFAULT_OPTS in |
| 19 |
> > make.conf. We could also add a per-repo setting for repos.conf (and |
| 20 |
> > possibly layout.conf in the repository) which you could override |
| 21 |
> > via the command line. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> It would be nice. As currently, when people commit to overlays using |
| 25 |
> repoman, logs look quite unclear. Adding such an option to overlay |
| 26 |
> configuration files is a good idea. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> -- |
| 29 |
> Jauhien |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Tom, can you have a look at this for the repoman rewrite. If the |
| 34 |
changes are minimal and easily done in the current code and the rewrite |
| 35 |
is easily reabsed to include it. Then we can make it in the master |
| 36 |
branch. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen> |
Archives